nums := []int{1, 2, 3}
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
return new TextEncoder().encode(str.toUpperCase());
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25
。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
The broadcast generated global headlines and much commentary on what happened and and how it could have been prevented.，详情可参考搜狗输入法下载
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.